In the past some period, I've been reading and consuming a lot of survival content and then there was a moment where I realized a pattern. Nature is a closed loop system with end goal of evolution and in this process, what is chosen is better and what that criteria exactly entails has been vague so far. Everywhere we observe a fundamental principle of natural selection. What exactly is this natural selection? Is it some remote entity guiding towards something or is it simply the constraints of environment that are limiting us and the drive to live determines the fundamental process we term as "Natural Selection". While the role of a higher entity remains debatable to the end of existence. That's not the topic I want to focus on at this moment.
Last time, I wrote about heroes and villains and what makes one. But there was a gaping hole left behind in the understanding of why it happens in the first place itself. So far, the pattern observed is that for every case scenario there are two sides chosen. In terms of mathematics, we can say that everyone chose a null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis and then everyone votes and joins their chosen faction. N0 aka the Null Hypothesis is the primary choice that is obvious and mostly majority supports it. N1 aka the alternative hypothesis is the choice that rest of the people with various reasons choose. Now, there's a test of time which decides the winner and then winner becomes the hero and loser becomes the villain. While heroes are easily made, a true villain is a tough one. Heroes are easy to come by dime a dozen since any sort of en-mass favor makes a hero. While a true villain is made by a true self sustained objective that someone desperately doesn't want to succeed whether it's masses or the hero itself. Narrative is woven around prospective villain's goals and then aura is created. Only a true villain can give birth to a true hero and round about isn't possible. It's equivalent of quoting only true darkness can show what true light actually means.
Slowly, when one is cornered enough a villain is born. Stronger the repulsion better the villain. Villains are created by the pressure and deeper desire of survival at any cost, barring all that has been understood so far. That's what makes them a villain as they challenge not only the current status quo but the existence of whatever exists so far, which makes it a lethal combination. But here, one point is to be keenly observed. While people made into hero or villains are chosen and pushed on the pedestal. Real ones who decide and play this game are the masses. Everything else is secondary and expendable. Why? The reason is survival. If most majority survives, nature evolves and survived ones know a method to survive and cross the test of time. Thus repeating this pattern until it stops working. There might be a time when no one wants to land on that pedestal and then maybe masses itself become villain. Both sides aka heroes and villains are so misaligned from the needs of masses that masses need to purge the current statuses and install a new ones to constantly churn and provide growth and nourishment to the masses. Otherwise ain't possible since in that scenario no one survives apart from heroes and villains, possibility of that event ain't exactly impossible but probability sure can be counted in fractions with a lot of 0s in front.
One example of this in our hindu mythology is seen with the story of Samundra Manthan. Gods (Dev) and Demons (Danavs) churning a sea using a snake (Vasuki Naag), Mountain (Mount Mandara) and Tortoise (Kurma Avatar of Lord Vishnu) pulling out various riches to immortality potion (Amrit) to poison (halal vish). This can be seen from taoism where it is represented as yin-yang where everything good has inherent evil inside and every evil has inherent good inside as well as lot of interpretations can be created from this same symbol.
Overall, everywhere we are observing this recurring pattern where sides are chosen followed by a struggle which we can say it's a test of time and it results in some output and then further churning continues. Until when? This question might be paradox in itself as when it stops moving it's no longer alive and rot catches up. So stopping is equally painful and constantly running doesn't change much there as well. All we can seek is refinement in this process of constant grinding to keep improve without losing ourselves and make something better of ourselves. Maybe this is true moksh that our hindu scriptures speak of. You can never be sure.

